Notice of Election

This is the Notice of an Election for the following positions:

 

President

Recording Secretary

Western Region TO Chair

Western Region IM Chair

Central Region TO Chair

Central Region IM Chair

Eastern Region IM Chair

Eastern Region TO Chair

on the Local 104 Executive Board, in accordance with our bylaws.

 

Key Dates:

 

Nominations: Jan 18-25

Voting: Feb 1-7

Results: Feb 16

 

Nomination forms are available online at:(https://104.cupe.ca/files/2021/01/Nomination-Package-2021-01-15.pdf.)

They must be scanned and e-mailed to elections@cupe104.ca before the nomination period closes on 2021-01-25.

 

Campaigning may take place at any time and is the sole responsibility of the nominee(s). Shortly after the close of the nomination period, and at the request of the nominee(s), the Elections Committee will send one email to the membership including: nominees’ names, work locations, and one URL link, provided by the nominee, pointing to a website of their choosing.

Voting will be by electronic ballot sent to the email we have on file from your membership form. This email will come from Simply Voting; remember to check your junk / spam folders. Voting will start on 2021-02-01 and remain open for seven (7) days. Results will be communicated on or before 2021-02-16.

Please ensure you read the nomination guide attached to the nomination form carefully as it contains important information. You will receive confirmation from the Elections Committee that your nomination form was received within 24 hours of sending it in. The Elections Committee is Vice President April Hallock, Trustee Michelle Boyko & Trustee Sadhana Kumar. You can contact your Steward, Regional Chairperson, or the Elections Committee with any questions.

In Solidarity,

CUPE Local 104 Elections Committee

Vacation Leave Carry-over limits

2021-01-09

CUPE 104 members are reminded that vacation leave balances will not be automatically cashed out this fiscal year if in excess of the annual carry-over limit (per the CHRO update issued 2020-06-04) and as per the rest of the Federal Public Service.  Employees now have until March 31st, 2022 to reduce their excess leave balances to under the carry-over limit (400hrs for Civilian Members and 262.5hrs for Public Service Employees).

Please contact your steward or regional chair if your manager attempts to put on you a leave action plan for this fiscal year with the goal of bringing you under the leave carry-over limits by March 31st, 2021 as that shouldn’t be happening.

President’s Message

2020-12-05

It goes without saying that this year has been a year like no other.  COVID-19 continues to challenge us and our communities in every respect including our health, child/elder parent care-giving responsibilities, economy, mental health, workplaces, and the list goes on.  I cannot be prouder to represent a most incredible group of people who continue to be heroes that are instrumental to Public and Officer safety.

I am hearing wonderful stories of people supporting their fellow colleagues within our group.  Let’s keep being there for each other as this situation continues.  It is important to try reaching out for help if you are struggling and it is just as important to reach out to others to check-in on them as they may not realize or be able to say that they are in crisis.

Mental health of first responders is becoming more and more a topic that is in the news and is well known but sadly inclusion of Public Safety Communicators (PSCs) in the first responder references is not prevalent.  We have an opportunity to change that!

We as TOs and IMs are PSCs and PSCs are operational first responders.  Moreover, this pandemic has proven that we are essential and critical services.  PSCs need to be recognized formally as essential to public safety and as First Responders.  Police officers, fire fighters, correctional officers and the like have a formal designation that is recognized in legislation and we do not.

We need statistics and research to support our stance and experiences.  We need facts and figures to back us up if we want or say we need more mental health support, that we should have better compensation for what we do, that we shouldn’t work as many years as we do until retirement, etc.

There is research currently being done by a distinguished researcher out of Memorial University on PSCs and their mental health.  We have an opportunity here to make a difference.  I encourage everyone to consider doing this survey as the more info that is obtained the better.  Information and link to this survey is found on our webpage (https://104.cupe.ca/2020/12/01/mental-health-study-for-public-safety-communicators-please-consider-participating/) and Facebook page.

Formal negotiations with the employer have begun!  It will be a long process to get to our first collective agreement, but it is extremely exciting to say that it’s started.

Our Recording Secretary, affectionately known as Karen LK, has just stepped down from her CUPE 104 duties and has moved onwards and upwards from a very distinguished and long career with the Force.  She will still be in the Public Service and serving in a critical role that supports Union and management relations and growth.  Karen worked extremely hard for CUPE 104 from before its inception right until her very last day and was instrumental in getting us to where we are today.  A very heartfelt thank-you to Karen for everything she has done and will continue to do for us as well as the whole of the greater public service in her new role.

Mental health study for Public Safety Communicators – Please consider participating

Dear Canadian public safety communicators,

APCO Canada and researchers from Memorial University have partnered together to deliver an anonymous survey designed to assess operational stress injuries (OSIs) among public safety communicators (e.g., 911, police, fire, and ambulance call-takers and dispatchers, emergency telecommunications). OSIs refer to many different clinically significant mental health symptoms of injury that are often called disorders (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, sleep disorders, substance abuse disorders).

This research will begin a communications-focused assessment of traumatic exposures, OSI symptoms and the associated impacts, on communicators and their families, as well as identifying individual differences in risk and resiliency that may serve as useful avenues for treatment.

For more reasons to participate or if you have any questions, feel free to contact the lead researcher for the study, Dr. Stephen Czarnuch (sczarnuch@mun.ca) 709.864.7850. He is happy to answer any questions.

Please remember that participation is confidential, and no identifying information will be shared with your employer or union or any person. The survey is voluntary and anonymous, so we cannot identify who participated, and your information will be protected. Participating (or choosing not to participate) will not, under any circumstances, impact your relationship with your employer, union, APCO Canada, or the researchers. The intention of this research is to try to understand how Canadian communicators can be best served, and how your needs can be met as we all work towards creating a healthier work environment.

This survey will take approximately 30 – 90 minutes to complete. You will be given a unique code when you first start the survey, and you can stop at any time and return to your survey where you stopped using this code. I encourage all communicators to participate via one of the links below:

Survey (English and French): (https://mun.az1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_aXfFrsQKdEqgamp)

 

Thank you!

Stephen Czarnuch, PhD, P.Eng.
Assistant Professor
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science /
Discipline of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Class Action Lawsuits involving the RCMP

2020-11-18

The following are brief descriptions and links of to three (3) Class Actions that involve the RCMP.  Should you require more information you may contact the individual law firms whose contact information can be found on their webpages per the links below as CUPE Local 104 is not a party to these lawsuits.

 

1) RCMP Sexual or gender based harassment or discrimination while employed in the RCMP

The Merlo Davidson class action sought financial compensation for female, current and former, living Regular Members, Civilian Members and Public Service Employees who worked within the RCMP from September 16, 1974 to May 30, 2017, and who experienced gender and/or sexual orientation based harassment and discrimination while working in the RCMP, and who have not opted out or are not deemed to have opted out of the Class Action.

** note this Class Action has already been heard and decided on. Individual claims are being submitted at this time. If this affects you, you may want to contact the law firm immediately, especially if you might need to put a claim in.

(https://merlodavidson.ca/en/rcmp-settlement/the-agreement/)

 

2) RCMP General Harassment Class Action

RCMP Members: including all Regular Members, Civilian Members, Special Constable, Special Constable Members, Supernumerary Special Constables, Reservists, and Recruits;

(http://www.complexlaw.ca/?fbclid=IwAR1Crrbrckv7IFu0MIG4txgGJPib0MHLwigSGeQL9Q69IHFZAVRPZQKj4Rk#FL-RCMP_General_Harrassment)

 

3) RCMP Operational Stress Injuries

The proposed class proceeding was filed on behalf of four Plaintiffs and seeks damages on behalf of themselves and a class of persons who are or have been enrolled as Officers and/or Members in the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and who have been diagnosed with, or suffered from, an Operational Stress Injury.

(https://wagners.co/practice-areas/class-actions/rcmp-operational-stress-injuries/?%20fbclid=IwAR3QbJnqULoOWOWZbci5M1rVSy5RIA_MhhJQiClVsHXjNZF03YMLMoX6h-c)

Notice of Election – Trustees

2020-11-16

This is the Notice of an Election for the positions of Trustees (x3) on the Local 104 Executive Board, in accordance with our bylaws.

Key Dates:

  • Nominations: Nov 18-25
  • Voting: Dec 2-8
  • Results: Dec 17

Nomination forms are available online at https://104.cupe.ca/files/2020/11/Nomination-Package-Trustee.pdf. They must be scanned and e-mailed to elections@cupe104.ca before the nomination period closes on 2020-11-25.

Campaigning may take place at any time and is the sole responsibility of the nominee(s). Shortly after the close of the nomination period, and at the request of the nominee(s), the Elections Committee will send one email to the membership including: nominees’ names, work locations, and one URL link, provided by the nominee, pointing to a website of their choosing.

Voting will be by electronic ballot sent to the email we have on file from your membership form. This email will come from Simply Voting; remember to check your junk / spam folders. Voting will start on 2020-12-02 and remain open for seven (7) days. Results will be communicated on or before 2020-12-17

Please ensure you read the nomination guide attached to the nomination form carefully as it contains important information. You will receive confirmation from the Elections Committee that your nomination form was received within 24 hours of sending it in. The Elections Committee is Vice President April Hallock, Eastern Region IM Chair Marc-Étienne Proteau, Central Region TO Chairperson Myles Kirchner. You can contact your Steward, Regional Chairperson, or the Elections Committee with any questions.

In Solidarity,

CUPE Local 104 Elections Committee

Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Job-Sharing

2020-11-15

On October 16th, 2020, a landmark decision was rendered by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) regarding members working in job-sharing situations and their ability to pay into their pension (Fraser v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 SCC 28). Members who reduce their hours through job-sharing arrangements were previously denied the ability to buy back their lost pension time. However, members who work regular hours and take leave without pay (LWOP) can buy back their pension time to make up for the LWOP time. This decision allows members who reduced their hours through job-sharing the ability to buy back the lost time into their pensions.

In their decision, the SCC noted that job-sharing arrangements were shown to be most predominant among women with young children. Therefore, the SCC ruled that the inability for members to buy back pension time while in a job-sharing role was a clear violation of s. 15(1) of the Charter because of the disproportionate impact on women.

Immediately following the decision, we wrote to the RCMP CHRO, RCMP Director of Pensions Services, and the Acting Director General of National Compensation Services requesting information on how this decision will be implemented. We are awaiting their direction. We look forward to this injustice being corrected and how exactly this will impact employees job-sharing situations as well as those that have had to change to part-time work to assist with family obligations.

The full SCC decision of Fraser v. Canada (Attorney General, 2020 Scc 28 (CanLII) can be  viewed here:  https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2020/2020scc28/2020scc28.html

 

COVID-19 Update #5

2020-11-15

We recently posted an Update on Access to 699 Leave Leave: (https://104.cupe.ca/2020/11/04/update-on-access-to-699-leave/).  Despite all the Unions, the employer has proceeded to change their direction for accessing other leave with pay (699). In some cases, the employer is requiring employees to exhaust other forms of paid leave before allowing access to the other leave with pay (699) provisions for COVID-19 related matters.

The employer previously attempted to make changes to the special leave with pay provisions prior to the start of the school year without consultation with any of the Unions. The Unions collectively fought back hard against this non-negotiated and potentially discriminatory change. This leave remains an important benefit and is part of our terms and conditions of employment that are frozen. We are continuing to fight this most recent change alongside the other federal public sector Unions.

As this virus continues to spread and as we are seeing positive cases in our workplaces, schools, homes, families, and friends, it is vital that everyone continues to follow the guidance and advice from federal / provincial / territorial / municipal health authorities. Most areas are well into the second wave of this pandemic and we must all continue to do our part to stay healthy and able to provide uninterrupted service to Canadians. Your continued commitment and dedication to serving Canadians is exemplary and although it may seem like it is “just what we do,” it is important to recognize this.

If you are experiencing any issues with the application of leave provisions relating to the pandemic, please continue to contact your Regional Chairperson for assistance and guidance. This includes being denied other leave with pay (699) for COVID-19 related matters due to the change in direction from the employer noted above. Also, if you hear of any unreasonable requests or directives coming from management, please let us know right away. The sooner we know about any issues or potential issues, the sooner we can help rectify them.

Keep up the great work and stay safe and healthy.

Update on Access To 699 Leave

2020-11-03

Last week, the Treasury Boards Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer (OCHRO) issued updated guidance to departments on the use of paid leave under the 699 leave code that contained ambiguous language about employees needing to exhaust other relevant forms of paid leave first. This is to take effect on Nov 9th, 2020. OCHRO further released clarifying documents that make it clear that the employer has chosen to violate the terms of our members’ collective agreements and human rights in the name of political expedience.

What’s changed

As of now, departments are being instructed to not consider requests for leave under clause 55.01 of the PO Collective Agreement (similar clauses exist in all other Public Service collectives), which provides for “leave with pay when circumstances not directly attributable to the employee prevent the employee’s reporting for duty,” until all other forms of paid leave have been exhausted, including annual leave.

The RCMP has not shared their interpretation of these changes so it is not clear how this will affect the CM Category.

Why does this matter?

This guidance has the effect of unilaterally adding conditions and restrictions that are not part of the PO collective agreement, which is an unambiguous breach of the agreement and our freedom of association under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Moreover, the employer’s own gender-based-plus analysis of these changes shows the impact will disproportionately affect women and members of traditionally marginalized groups. These actions are discriminatory and a gross violation of your rights, not to mention an affront to the working relationship we’ve tried hard to maintain during this unprecedented time.

Furthermore, these changes create instability and uncertainty at a time when the second wave of the pandemic is hitting across the country. This compromises the mental health of the entire group and sets up unnecessary obstacles to those who want to respect public health directives for the good of all Canadians.

What comes next?

We have made it clear to the employer that this is not the time to gut a system that is working well to assist members in managing the pandemic. Instead they have decided to make changes that constitute a violation of your collective agreement, human rights and Charter rights. It is not the employer’s responsibility – nor that of the managers they’re delegating these decisions to – to choose which rights to uphold and which to reject in the name of politics.

Our union president has joined several other federal public service union presidents (total of 17) and sent a joint letter to the Treasury Board Minister yesterday expressing our concerns (ie: health, labour relations and human rights) asking him to direct his staff to backtrack on this new direction.

If you are refused access to leave code 699, contact your steward or regional chairperson and we will assist you and, if appropriate, immediately begin the process of filing a grievance on your behalf. In the meantime, we will also be filing a policy grievance on behalf of the group. Analysis has already begun on further formal action including complaint(s) to the Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board, under human rights legislation and regarding the violation of your Charter rights.

All members are encouraged to schedule all personal and annual leave credited this year, if at all possible, to avoid the employer scheduling your annual leave or denying access to 699 leave on the basis that you have unscheduled annual leave.

2.3% Market Adjustment

2020-10-28

In September, the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board (FPSLREB) finally moved forward on this file regarding the disclosure issue that was previously raised. We are still seeking copies of relevant records from the employer. Some records were partially provided previously, and most were heavily redacted. Treasury Board responded by asking for an extension on the disclosure deadline to October 15th. We have still not received a response. On October 15th, our lawyer sent a formal response about this to Treasury Board and the FPSLREB which also reaffirmed our position to move ahead with a virtual hearing as soon as possible.

We continue to be active on this case. We will keep pushing for this disclosure and for a hearing as soon as possible. We are ready and it is far from over. We are not done with this by any stretch of the imagination.

Our first hearing at the FPSLREB, occurred back in December 2019. At that hearing, instead of dealing with the complaint at hand, the employer put up roadblocks relating to disclosure and the hearing was adjourned until June 2020. The hearing scheduled for June was postponed due to COVID-19.

The Public Service Police Operations Support group (PO – TCO and IMA subgroups) is pay matched to the Civilian Member Law Enforcement Support group (LES – IM and TO subgroups). These groups are pay matched to the Regular Member (RM) pay and have been decades. This may change during the collective bargaining process; however, our position is that it has not changed yet and no changes to this pay structure has ever been communicated to us.

In 2016, RMs were given a 2.3% market adjustment pay increase and we were denied this same pay increase. Around the same time, we applied for union certification and the RCMP has been trying to re-write history after the fact. We will not let this go. By all accounts, we should have been provided this same pay increase in 2016 and we will keep fighting to make sure that we get it.